Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Gauhati High Court Case Commentaries

Strict Compliance with Section 81(3) in Election Petitions: The Imperative of Proper Attestation

Strict Compliance with Section 81(3) in Election Petitions: The Imperative of Proper Attestation

Date: Apr 11, 2025
Strict Compliance with Section 81(3) in Election Petitions: The Imperative of Proper Attestation Introduction The judgment in KRIPANATH MALLAH v. HAFIZ RASHID AHMED CHOUDHURY represents a crucial...
Ensuring Reliability of Child Witness Testimony in POCSO Trials: Medical Evidence and ‘Sterling Quality’ Standard

Ensuring Reliability of Child Witness Testimony in POCSO Trials: Medical Evidence and ‘Sterling Quality’ Standard

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Ensuring Reliability of Child Witness Testimony in POCSO Trials: Medical Evidence and ‘Sterling Quality’ Standard Introduction In Promud Yadav v. The State of Assam & Anr. (2025 Gauhati High Court,...
Misconception of Consent in Long-Term Relationships: Reinterpreting Section 417 IPC in Guluk Kathar v. State of Assam

Misconception of Consent in Long-Term Relationships: Reinterpreting Section 417 IPC in Guluk Kathar v. State of Assam

Date: Jan 23, 2025
Misconception of Consent in Long-Term Relationships: Reinterpreting Section 417 IPC in Guluk Kathar v. State of Assam Introduction The judgment in Guluk Kathar v. State of Assam marks a significant...
Ensuring Mandatory Consideration Under the Probation of Offenders Act: A New Precedent from the Gauhati High Court

Ensuring Mandatory Consideration Under the Probation of Offenders Act: A New Precedent from the Gauhati High Court

Date: Jan 7, 2025
Ensuring Mandatory Consideration Under the Probation of Offenders Act: A New Precedent from the Gauhati High Court 1. Introduction The Judgment of the Gauhati High Court in the matter of Abdur Rahman...
Reiterating the Necessity of Demonstrating a “Real Possibility of Bail” in Preventive Detention Orders

Reiterating the Necessity of Demonstrating a “Real Possibility of Bail” in Preventive Detention Orders

Date: Dec 13, 2024
Reiterating the Necessity of Demonstrating a “Real Possibility of Bail” in Preventive Detention Orders I. Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision in Shri Gurmej Singh Batth v. State...
Establishing a Three-Month Limit for Deemed Suspension under Assam Services Rules: RAFED ALI AHMED v. The State of Assam

Establishing a Three-Month Limit for Deemed Suspension under Assam Services Rules: RAFED ALI AHMED v. The State of Assam

Date: Feb 18, 2023
Establishing a Three-Month Limit for Deemed Suspension under Assam Services Rules: RAFED ALI AHMED v. The State of Assam Introduction The case of RAFED ALI AHMED v. The State of Assam and 3 Ors...
Regularization of Irregular Appointments and Applicability of NDCPS: Abani Baruah & 44 ORS v. State of Assam

Regularization of Irregular Appointments and Applicability of NDCPS: Abani Baruah & 44 ORS v. State of Assam

Date: May 11, 2022
Regularization of Irregular Appointments and Applicability of NDCPS: Abani Baruah & 44 ORS v. State of Assam Introduction The case of Abani Baruah and 44 Others v. The State of Assam and Others was...
Expanded Interpretation of "Neighbourhood" in Fishery Settlements under Assam Fishery Rules: Gauhati High Court Sets New Precedent

Expanded Interpretation of "Neighbourhood" in Fishery Settlements under Assam Fishery Rules: Gauhati High Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Apr 28, 2022
Expanded Interpretation of "Neighbourhood" in Fishery Settlements under Assam Fishery Rules: Gauhati High Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Pub Goalpara Fishery Co-Operative Society,...
Gauhati High Court Upholds Old Pension Scheme for Recruitees Initiating Selection in 2003

Gauhati High Court Upholds Old Pension Scheme for Recruitees Initiating Selection in 2003

Date: Feb 5, 2022
Gauhati High Court Upholds Old Pension Scheme for Recruitees Initiating Selection in 2003 Introduction In the landmark case of Sanjay Kumar And Another v. Union Of India, the Gauhati High Court...
Gauhati High Court Upholds Fair Tender Practices in Fishery Settlements

Gauhati High Court Upholds Fair Tender Practices in Fishery Settlements

Date: Nov 3, 2021
Gauhati High Court Upholds Fair Tender Practices in Fishery Settlements Introduction In the landmark case of Malegarh Gobindapur Fishery Cooperative Society Ltd. v. State Of Assam, the Gauhati High...
Reaffirming Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Foreigners Tribunal Proceedings: Haidar Ali v. Union of India

Reaffirming Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Foreigners Tribunal Proceedings: Haidar Ali v. Union of India

Date: Mar 31, 2021
Reaffirming Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Standards in Foreigners Tribunal Proceedings Haidar Ali v. Union of India Introduction The case of Haidar Ali v. Union of India, adjudicated by the Gauhati...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Retrospectivity of Per Incuriam Judgments in Central Excise Refunds

Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Retrospectivity of Per Incuriam Judgments in Central Excise Refunds

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Retrospectivity of Per Incuriam Judgments in Central Excise Refunds Introduction The case of M/S JOYSHREE POWEROL v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS, adjudicated by the...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Central Excise Act Amidst Per Incuriam Judgments

Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Central Excise Act Amidst Per Incuriam Judgments

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Central Excise Act Amidst Per Incuriam Judgments Introduction The case of KAMLANG SAW AND VENEER MILLS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS....
Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Prevailing Law Despite Subsequent Per Incuriam Rulings

Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Prevailing Law Despite Subsequent Per Incuriam Rulings

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Finality of Refunds Under Prevailing Law Despite Subsequent Per Incuriam Rulings Introduction The case of M/S CENT PLY v. Union of India and 2 Ors. was adjudicated in...
Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.: A Landmark Judgment on Erroneous Refunds and Judicial Finality

Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.: A Landmark Judgment on Erroneous Refunds and Judicial Finality

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.: A Landmark Judgment on Erroneous Refunds and Judicial Finality Introduction In the case of Assam Carbon Products Ltd. v. Union of India and...
Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance

Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Erroneous Refunds of Education Cess under Central Excise Act: Gauhati High Court’s Stance Introduction The case of M/S Jumbo Roofing and Tiles v. Union of India and 3 Ors. was adjudicated by the...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act

Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Gauhati High Court Establishes Boundaries on Erroneous Refund Recovery under Central Excise Act Introduction In the landmark case M/S. Bulland Cement Pvt. Ltd. v. The Union of India and 4 Ors., the...
Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India

Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India

Date: Mar 13, 2021
Finality of Judicial Decisions: Insights from Topcem India v. Union of India Introduction In the landmark case of Topcem India, Rep By Sri. Arun Kejriwal v. Union Of India, Rep. By The Secretary To...
Presumption of Guilt and Reverse Burden of Proof Under POCSO Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupen Kalita v. State Of Assam

Presumption of Guilt and Reverse Burden of Proof Under POCSO Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupen Kalita v. State Of Assam

Date: Jun 6, 2020
Presumption of Guilt and Reverse Burden of Proof Under POCSO Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Bhupen Kalita v. State Of Assam Introduction Bhupen Kalita v. State Of Assam, decided by the Gauhati High...
Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Applicability of NPS for Pre-2005 Regular Appointments in "Manati Basumatary v. State of Assam"

Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Applicability of NPS for Pre-2005 Regular Appointments in "Manati Basumatary v. State of Assam"

Date: Jan 31, 2020
Gauhati High Court Establishes Non-Applicability of NPS for Pre-2005 Regular Appointments in "Manati Basumatary v. State of Assam" Introduction The case of Manati Basumatary v. State of Assam emerged...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert